[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] which is better: clisp or threaded sbcl?
From: |
Jeronimo Pellegrini |
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] which is better: clisp or threaded sbcl? |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:48:14 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 07:57:43AM -0700, Carlos Konstanski wrote:
> I have just discovered stumpwm. I love it on my x86 machine, where I
> can let stumpwm run in cmucl.
>
> On my x86_64 machine, however, I am running into issues. I need to
> use a threaded SBCL for website work. This SBCL has the
> much-mentioned keyboard freezing problem when I run stumpwm in it.
I have been using threaded SBCL without apparent problems. The box
freezes for seconds sometimes, but it is probably because I'm using
some progrmas that do swap a lot.
Maybe this has fixed the issue:
1.0.14.4: increase MAX_INTERRUPTS to 1024
* ...hopefully fixing Stumpwm, and other signal-prone applications.
So, getting the latest git/cvs version may help. But I'm not sure
since I don't know much about it (I just use StumpWM, and it's been
really good so far).
J.