Re: [STUMP] which is better: clisp or threaded sbcl?

[ciriaco]

From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [STUMP] which is better: clisp or threaded sbcl?
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:48:14 -0300

> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 07:57:43AM -0700, Carlos Konstanski wrote:
> > I have just discovered stumpwm.  I love it on my x86 machine, where I
> > can let stumpwm run in cmucl.
> > 
> > On my x86_64 machine, however, I am running into issues.  I need to
> > use a threaded SBCL for website work.  This SBCL has the
> > much-mentioned keyboard freezing problem when I run stumpwm in it. 
> 
> I have been using threaded SBCL without apparent problems. The box
> freezes for seconds sometimes, but it is probably because I'm using
> some progrmas that do swap a lot.
> 
> Maybe this has fixed the issue:
> 
> 1.0.14.4: increase MAX_INTERRUPTS to 1024
> * ...hopefully fixing Stumpwm, and other signal-prone applications.
> 
> So, getting the latest git/cvs version may help. But I'm not sure
> since I don't know much about it (I just use StumpWM, and it's been
> really good so far).
> 
> J.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Stumpwm-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
did you try lowering dynamic-space-size, i.e.
sbcl --dynamic-space-size 265
Fulvio