[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] which is better: clisp or threaded sbcl?
|
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
|
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] which is better: clisp or threaded sbcl? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:34:54 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
"Bill Clementson" <address@hidden> writes:
Hi Bill,
> Just curious - what is preventing you from using threaded SBCL for
> website work and non-threaded SBCL with StumpWM (e.g. - two separate
> SBCL builds)?
Compared with clisp SBCL eats memory with a shovel instead of a spoon,
so nobody wants to run two SBCL processes. ;-)
Bye,
Tassilo