[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] Hangs with run-shell-command
From: |
Julian Stecklina |
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] Hangs with run-shell-command |
Date: |
Wed, 28 May 2008 20:45:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Ian Ross <address@hidden> writes:
> I have a modified version of battery.lisp that doesn't use
> run-shell-command. However, it uses split-sequence from the
> cl-utilities package, and I don't know how people feel about adding that
> sort of dependency to stumpwm. I've put the code below for you to look
> at. Any guidance on whether this would be acceptable as a patch? (I
> seem to remember making some other changes at the same time, as I was
> having trouble with stumpwm hanging when the battery state changed. I
> can figure out the differences needed just to remove the
> run-shell-command calls and offer those as a patch if that seems like a
> good idea.)
You could rewrite that using cl-ppcre, which stumpwm already depends on.
Regards,
--
Julian Stecklina
Well, take it from an old hand: the only reason it would be easier to
program in C is that you can't easily express complex problems in C,
so you don't. - Erik Naggum (in comp.lang.lisp)
(Spam-Experiment: http://cthulhu.c3d2.de/~astro/badpit.html )
Re: [STUMP] Re: Lisp crashes with stumpwm, Vitaly Mayatskikh, 2008/05/26
Re: [STUMP] Re: Lisp crashes with stumpwm, Shawn Betts, 2008/05/26