Re: [STUMP] fselect to support >10 frames

[John Li]

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:50:36PM +0100, Bob Farrell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:06:29AM -0400, John Li wrote:
>  
> > Yes, you can reach up to 36 frames by using an alphanumeric
> > *frame-number-map*, but this way, you can have 1,000 frames all
> > accessible with at most 3 keystrokes - which would likely be a
> > distinguishing stumpwm feature (try using Exposé there!), and it's
> > clearly the direction we're going in as people get larger screens and
> > multi-head desktops =).
> > 
> > 
> I think you're insane. 36 is easily enough. John.

Wrong.

http://circularly.org/tmp/frames.png

So very wrong.


Yrs,
John