Re: [STUMP] fselect to support >10 frames

[Shawn Betts]

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 7:18 AM, John Li <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 02:50:36PM +0100, Bob Farrell wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 08:06:29AM -0400, John Li wrote:
>>
>> > Yes, you can reach up to 36 frames by using an alphanumeric
>> > *frame-number-map*, but this way, you can have 1,000 frames all
>> > accessible with at most 3 keystrokes - which would likely be a
>> > distinguishing stumpwm feature (try using Exposé there!), and it's
>> > clearly the direction we're going in as people get larger screens and
>> > multi-head desktops =).
>> >
>> >
>> I think you're insane. 36 is easily enough. John.
>
> Wrong.
>
> http://circularly.org/tmp/frames.png
>
> So very wrong.

This is Special Agent Sabetts from the Automation Division at Computer
Abuse Headquarters and I'm gonna need to see the source code for the
function used to create 1000 frames just to confirm that there were no
computers harmed in the making of your screenshot

-Shawn