[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update
From: |
Alexander Isacson |
Subject: |
Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update |
Date: |
12 Nov 2002 22:23:13 +0100 |
This is great news. I installed texmacs from gentoo with the CXXFLAGS
set to -mcpu=i386 and now it seems more stable. But I did have some
problems with emphasized text. It segfaulted when trying to generate the
font. This is what was written to the console:
TeXmacs] Executing mktextfm ecbx14.tfm
mktextfm: /var/cache/fonts/tfm/ecbx14.tfm already exists.
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexupd: /var/cache/fonts/ls-R unwritable.
/var/cache/fonts/tfm/ecbx14.tfm
TeXmacs] Loading cmr14 at 600 dpi
TeXmacs] Loading ecti10 at 600 dpi
TeXmacs] Executing mktextfm ecti10.tfm
mktextfm: /var/cache/fonts/tfm/ecti10.tfm already exists.
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexupd: /var/cache/fonts/ls-R unwritable.
/var/cache/fonts/tfm/ecti10.tfm
Warning: I could not find the TeX font ecti10 at 600 dpi
I will use the standard font cmr10 instead
Fatal error: more bits than required while unpacking in 'unpack'
See file : load-pk.gen.cc
When I started texmacs again the text did not become emphazised and I
tried recreateing the fonts, first by removing my ~/.texmacs dir and
also by issuing the following command:
mktextfm ecti10.tfm
which yields:
mktextfm: /usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/ecti10.tfm already exists.
/usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/ecti10.tfm
Any advice is greatly appriciated.
Best regards,
Alexander Isacson
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 14:30, Felix Breuer wrote:
> > > On PIII-750 unoptimized TeXmacs is rather usable :)
> >
> > Are there any problems left with the unoptimized version
> > in the case of gcc-3.2?
>
> I have been working with an unoptimized version (on a P4m) for weeks
> now, and I didn't have any problems whatsoever.
>
> TeXmacs is also included (again) in the Gentoo GNU/Linux distro, as a
> "testing" package however. (You have to add ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" to
> /etc/make.conf to unmask it; you also have to turn of optimization in
> your CXXFLAGS in make.conf.)
>
> Felix
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Texmacs-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
>
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] [PATCH] solves GCC 3.2 auto_save segfault for me..., (continued)
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] [PATCH] solves GCC 3.2 auto_save segfault for me..., Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/11/08
- [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 segfaults..., Igor V. Kovalenko, 2002/11/08
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 segfaults..., Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/11/08
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update, Igor V. Kovalenko, 2002/11/11
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update, Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/11/12
- [Texmacs-dev] Usability of TeXmacs on 2 year old computers, Álvaro Tejero Cantero, 2002/11/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Usability of TeXmacs on 2 year old computers, Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/11/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Usability of TeXmacs on 2 year old computers, Álvaro Tejero Cantero, 2002/11/13
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] Usability of TeXmacs on 2 year old computers, David Allouche, 2002/11/13
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update, Felix Breuer, 2002/11/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update,
Alexander Isacson <=
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update, Felix Breuer, 2002/11/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update, Alexander Isacson, 2002/11/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update, Igor V. Kovalenko, 2002/11/12
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update, Igor V. Kovalenko, 2002/11/25
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update, Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/11/25
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update, Igor V. Kovalenko, 2002/11/25
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update, David Allouche, 2002/11/26
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update, Igor V. Kovalenko, 2002/11/26
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update, David Allouche, 2002/11/27
- Re: [Texmacs-dev] GCC 3.2 status update, Joris van der Hoeven, 2002/11/27