Re: [Texmacs-dev] continuations

[Gubinelli Massimiliano]

I'm still not quite sure that the specific problem I'm looking at is due to 
continuations. I agree that for the overall robustness of the code we should 
get rid of the continuation stuff (nice idea but problematic in contact with 
C++ as I only now realize).   If I have time I will try to replace the 
continuation code with a system based on closures (i.e. explicit continuations).

m

On 22 déc. 2010, at 17:19, Joris van der Hoeven wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:25:59PM +0100, Gubinelli Massimiliano wrote:
>> I think that the bug I'm referring to is quite serious and I would like to 
>> get rid of it as soon as possible. I do not know why such kind of problems 
>> do not show up also in the X11 code.
> 
> If you have some energy to spend on this issue, you might try to rewrite
> most of the file tm-dialogue.scm using closures instead of continuations,
> and maybe some of the code which depends on it, if you want to make some
> syntactical changes. For the moment, dialogues are rarely nested
> (maybe only at one or two places), so you may deal with these cases manually,
> and make the existing syntax work in the most straightforward cases.
> 
> Best, --Joris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Texmacs-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev