Re: Sourceforge page purpose

[Zeno Gantner]

"Frederico S. Muñoz" wrote:

> The hurd.sf.net page should be independent of the gnu.org one, in the
> sense that it should be continued ad also provided information to
> users/developers; having said that, there's no need to say that any
> content that get's into sourceforge's page can be used in gnu.org page.
> The trick here is: the gnu.org page is an official page for the
> GNU/Hurd, and as such IMHO it should focus on more mature things (not as
> mature as 4 years, but things that aren't totally experimental and that
> could even lead to nowhere), while at the same time following every
> gnu.org policy in the book and, in fact, being the central and principal
> page for users, developers and ppl that want to know about the Hurd; the
> sf.net page could, since it's unofficial, include things that are much,
> much more immature, and also contain links to things that fall short of
> gnu policy (e.g. VMWare install instructions, for example).

I think this is a good suggestion, but I would remove the forums and
the bug tracking system, because there are already the mailing lists...

cu Zeno