adonthell-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Adonthell-devel] More errors. . .


From: Alexandre Courbot
Subject: Re: [Adonthell-devel] More errors. . .
Date: 09 Mar 2002 11:25:37 +0100

le mer 06-03-2002 à 21:09, Kai Sterker a écrit :
> On Wednesday 06 March 2002 19:02, you wrote:
> 
> > > You'll possibly have to install libfreetype2. Or at least the dev
> > > package.
> >
> > Installed the dev package. Now I get:
> >
> > In file included from atk_font.h:30,
> >                  from atk_font.cc:17:
> > /usr/include/ft2build.h:55: freetype/config/ftheader.h: No such file or
> > directory
> > In file included from atk_font.cc:17:
> > atk_font.h:31: `#include' expects "FILENAME" or <FILENAME>
> >
> > Hooray for broken dependencies.
> 
> Weird. Actually, I had the same error on the SuSE box, until I removed the 
> package and installed libfreetype 2 from source.

Ah, just had the same problem than Joseph with my libfreetype 6.1. This
is because freetype packages install include files into a special
include subdirectory. That probably doesn't happen with the osurce.
Shouldn't be a problem provided we include freetype-config --cflags in
our compilation flags, but on my box they weren't included, because they
was defined as FT2_CFLAGS & FT2_LIBS in aclocal.m4 and FTT2_CFLAGS and
FTT2_LIBS everywhere else. Changing everything to match the aclocal.m4
definitions simply fixed the problem. Now it just works fine! Just
commited it. Don't forget to get alextest.tgz again on my website if you
want to mess with the map engine - I've changed it again yesterday, with
a basic support for map characters models.

Another thing that ennoys me a little bit is the last line of the
configure report:

Data directory ............ : ${prefix}/share/adonthell

The "${prefix}" isn't very nice, and man could think this is an error.
I've tried thousands of combinaisons without being able to get a proper
display. Do someone have an idea?

Also, I've seen you changed the version number to 0.4alpha1. While this
is a relief to see we finally changed version number, :) weren't our
naming convention so far to name pre-releases like 0.4pre1?

(Also, "alpha" sounds a bit too much like you-know-who ;p)

See you ;)
Alex.
-- 
http://www.gnurou.org




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]