[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoconf option fun
From: |
Bruce Korb |
Subject: |
Re: autoconf option fun |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Nov 2000 14:59:40 -0800 |
Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
> Hello, Peter!
>
> > Exactly where do the GNU standards say anything about long option
> > abbreviation?
>
> Well, whenever I don't check something I'm punished for that :-)
>
> Alexandre wrote that. I just repeated after him. I couldn't find anything in
> standards.texi about abbreviations.
>
> So it's probably a de-facto semi-standard.
De-facto often used convention. It is also highly desireable,
especially for the excessively verbose long options :-).
That is why I went to the trouble to support them.
- Re: autoconf option fun, (continued)
- Re: autoconf option fun, Bruce Korb, 2000/11/09
- Re: autoconf option fun, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/09
- Re: autoconf option fun, Peter Eisentraut, 2000/11/09
- Re: autoconf option fun, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/09
- Re: autoconf option fun,
Bruce Korb <=
- Re: autoconf option fun, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/10
- Re: autoconf option fun, Bruce Korb, 2000/11/09
- Re: autoconf option fun, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/10