[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59)
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) |
Date: |
31 Jan 2001 17:04:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Crater Lake) |
>>>>> "Alexandre" == Alexandre Oliva <address@hidden> writes:
Alexandre> Hmm... It's just occurred to me that this kind of test may
Alexandre> not work in general. AFAIK, some old Unices just won't run
Alexandre> shell-scripts like that; you have to explicitly specify the
Alexandre> shell that must run them. I'd love to be proven wrong, but
Alexandre> if I'm right, it defeats the whole testing mechanism. We
Alexandre> can't have an executable, because then we'd need a compiler
Alexandre> for the build machine, and we can't have a script because
Alexandre> we may have to explicitly specify a shell, and then, then
Alexandre> shell may not search the PATH.
It seems to me that falling to `:' is way enough for this case.
- GNATS needs some work, Pavel Roskin, 2001/01/30
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Tim Van Holder, 2001/01/30
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Akim Demaille, 2001/01/30
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Pavel Roskin, 2001/01/30
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Akim Demaille, 2001/01/31
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Alexandre Oliva, 2001/01/31
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59),
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Alexandre Oliva, 2001/01/31
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Tim Van Holder, 2001/01/31
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Pavel Roskin, 2001/01/30
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Akim Demaille, 2001/01/31
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Earnie Boyd, 2001/01/31
- RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Tim Van Holder, 2001/01/31
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Mark E., 2001/01/30