[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59)
From: |
Mark E. |
Subject: |
Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59) |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:53:22 -0500 |
> > I'd like to volunteer to handle anything DOS/DJGPP-related if
> > possible.
>
> Thanks!
Same here.
> I'd like to advise you that it would be fair not to support non-UNIX path
> separators on the build system.
Naturally, I'll have to disagree. I don't see why Autoconf should care which
path separator is used as long as Autoconf can figure it out.
> On the other hand, support for non-UNIX path separators on the host would
> be a feature that very few people need. It falls outside the area of
> "generic" macros that Autoconf contains.
I don't think I'd call the roughly 85% of people that use operating systems
with a non-Unix path separator "very few".
Mark
- Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), (continued)
Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Pavel Roskin, 2001/01/30
Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Akim Demaille, 2001/01/31
Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Earnie Boyd, 2001/01/31
RE: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Tim Van Holder, 2001/01/31
Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59),
Mark E. <=
Re: GNATS needs some work (autoconf/59), Akim Demaille, 2001/01/31