Re: autoconf auxdir

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Apr 12, 2001, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:

> Are we talking about the same thing?  I'm referring to where
> mkinstalldirs, config.guess, etc. will be instead of the top level...

Yeah.  What do mkinstalldirs, install-sh, missing, depcomp, ylwrap,
etc have to do with config?  They're supporting scripts.  So SUP is
more appropriate than CFG or CONFIG, for the very reason that it's
more general.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me