[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 52-factored-install.patch
|
From: |
Tom Tromey |
|
Subject: |
Re: 52-factored-install.patch |
|
Date: |
26 Feb 2001 11:23:40 -0700 |
>>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
Akim> So it is my (today's :) understanding that I did wrong to have
Akim> some primaries independent from the dir name, right?
Right. The primaries are irrelevant at this stage.
Akim> But both CVS and 1.4 refuse sbin_DATA :(
Sorry, bad example. sysconf_DATA is a better one.
Tom
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, (continued)
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/23
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/24
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, akim, 2001/02/24
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/25
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/25
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/25
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/25
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, akim, 2001/02/25
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/25
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/26
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/26
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/26
- Re: 52-factored-install.patch, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/25