Re: `print' does not print

[Eli Zaretskii]

On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, David Kaelbling wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > 
> > It sounds like I have version 6.5.14m of the OS here.  But if you tell me
> > what to look for in the output of versions(1), I can give a more precise
> > answer.
> 
> Running "uname -R" will give you the micro-release number.

Yes, it says 6.5.14m.  So that's probably the reason I never saw such 
problems.

> > Anyway, I don't know if this is a factor, but my libraries are all built
> > from sources, and I linked them in statically.
> 
> Hmm.  I won't have time in the next two weeks, but I'll try building
> with static libraries too.  Not as nice, but if it works that'll do.

It's not as nice, granted; but it makes my binary movable anywhere, so I 
don't need to depend on sysadmins' mercy... well, you know what I mean.