[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input metho
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:38:47 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:33:44 -0400
> Cc: 18023@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > This patch permits the user to type " _" using the latin-postfix input
> > method. ATM the user has to use the following sequence:
> > `SPC SPC DEL _'
>
> I have no objection to the patch, but don't have time to evaluate it
> (I'm travelling and only have occasionally Internet access).
FWIW, it strikes me that "C-q _" is less typing.
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Daimrod, 2014/07/15
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Daimrod, 2014/07/21
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Stefan Monnier, 2014/07/21
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Daimrod, 2014/07/21
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/07/21
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Daimrod, 2014/07/22
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/07/25
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Daimrod, 2014/07/25
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, K. Handa, 2014/07/24