[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input metho
From: |
Daimrod |
Subject: |
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:28:26 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.92 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:33:44 -0400
>> Cc: 18023@debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> > This patch permits the user to type " _" using the latin-postfix input
>> > method. ATM the user has to use the following sequence:
>> > `SPC SPC DEL _'
>>
>> I have no objection to the patch, but don't have time to evaluate it
>> (I'm travelling and only have occasionally Internet access).
>
> FWIW, it strikes me that "C-q _" is less typing.
It's not consistent and it doesn't really save typing:
- "SPC _ _"
- "SPC C-q _"
--
Daimrod/Greg
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, K. Handa, 2014/07/24