[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input metho
From: |
K. Handa |
Subject: |
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jul 2014 23:09:00 +0900 |
In article <jwv1ttea7gd.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@gnu.org>, Stefan Monnier
<monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> > This patch permits the user to type " _" using the latin-postfix input
> > method. ATM the user has to use the following sequence:
> > `SPC SPC DEL _'
> I have no objection to the patch, but don't have time to evaluate it
> (I'm travelling and only have occasionally Internet access).
I agree with the patch because it provides the consistent
behavor of that input method; i.e. when latin-post converts
the typing of "xy" to "z", you can insert "xy" by typing
"xyy" without deactivating the input method.
---
Kenichi Handa
handa@gnu.org
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Daimrod, 2014/07/15
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Daimrod, 2014/07/21
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Stefan Monnier, 2014/07/21
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/07/21
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Daimrod, 2014/07/21
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/07/21
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Daimrod, 2014/07/22
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/07/25
- bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, Daimrod, 2014/07/25
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method,
K. Handa <=