[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input metho
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 06:47:28 +0300 |
> From: Daimrod <daimrod@gmail.com>
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>, 18023@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 09:28:26 +0900
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> >> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> >> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 14:33:44 -0400
> >> Cc: 18023@debbugs.gnu.org
> >>
> >> > This patch permits the user to type " _" using the latin-postfix input
> >> > method. ATM the user has to use the following sequence:
> >> > `SPC SPC DEL _'
> >>
> >> I have no objection to the patch, but don't have time to evaluate it
> >> (I'm travelling and only have occasionally Internet access).
> >
> > FWIW, it strikes me that "C-q _" is less typing.
>
> It's not consistent and it doesn't really save typing:
> - "SPC _ _"
> - "SPC C-q _"
I meant "SPC SPC DEL _". As for "SPC _ _", it's of the same length,
so it doesn't save typing, either.
bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method, K. Handa, 2014/07/24