[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Feb 2020 19:39:45 +0200 |
> From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 18:26:13 +0100 (CET)
> cc: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>, 39546@debbugs.gnu.org,
> larsi@gnus.org, michael.albinus@gmx.de, tsdh@gnu.org
>
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2020, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > subr.el is preloaded, so doing that will enlarge the Emacs memory
> > footprint. Is that function important enough to have it preloaded?
> According with its usage at Emacs source (only at json.el) I'd say
> the answer to your question is: not worth to be at subr.el.
That's what I thought. So I suggest to find another file to host this
function, if we want subr-x.el to have only macros and defsubst's.
Thanks.
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Michael Albinus, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tassilo Horn, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/14
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/02/19