[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time
From: |
Tino Calancha |
Subject: |
bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:49:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com> writes:
> "Tassilo Horn" <tsdh@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Am Mo, 10. Feb 2020, um 20:30, schrieb Tino Calancha:
>>> replace.el is a good agreement between subr-x.el (it's a defun, so
>>> it doesn't fit well there) and subr.el.
>>>
>>> As subr.el, replace.el is also loaded at start time, but it's ~ half size,
>>> and more important than that, it's all about replacing in Emacs.
>>
>> Sounds good to me!
>
> Here is the updated patch:
> - It deletes the cookie from subr-x (yes, we have one for when-let)
> - Move replace-region-contents inside replace.el (loaded at startup)
> - Add all required (eval-when...(req.. 'subr-x)) at tramp files
> - Replaced loading subr-x at run time with compile time for some other files
>
> I have run the testsuite without surprises.
Well, actually there was a surprise, but who don't like surprises after
all!
I missed this one (it was relying on the whe-let cookie):
diff --git a/lisp/image/exif.el b/lisp/image/exif.el
index 642bc58321..27ad616146 100644
--- a/lisp/image/exif.el
+++ b/lisp/image/exif.el
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
;;; Code:
(require 'cl-lib)
+(eval-when-compile (require 'subr-x))
(defvar exif-tag-alist
'((11 processing-software)
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, (continued)
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tassilo Horn, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time,
Tino Calancha <=
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/14
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/02/19