[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Feb 2020 12:16:26 +0200 |
> From: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>
> Cc: 39546@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
> michael.albinus@gmx.de, larsi@gnus.org
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 22:00:21 +0100
>
> Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> I have run the testsuite without surprises.
> > Well, actually there was a surprise, but who don't like surprises after
> > all!
> Well, I must recognize I am one of those guys who doesn't like
> surprises. It seems `when-let' became very popular these days.
>
> Here is the updated patch. It takes in account all usages of `when-let'
> once dropped the cookie.
Thanks.
Are we talking about doing these changes on master? Because I think
such wide-sweeping changes that aren't bugfixes are not really
appropriate for the release branch. If you want to move
replace-region-contents to replace.el on emacs-27, I agree, but all
the rest should go to master, I think.
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, (continued)
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tassilo Horn, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/02/19