[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:59:39 +0200 |
> From: Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org>
> Cc: Tino Calancha <tino.calancha@gmail.com>, 39546@debbugs.gnu.org,
> larsi@gnus.org, michael.albinus@gmx.de
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 20:19:05 +0100
>
> I've already submitted patches to hindent (and I think to some other 3rd
> party package providing code formatting by replacing with the output of
> some formatting tool) using that function.
>
> Anyway, if it is going to be moved, I'd to ask you to move it in
> emacs-27 so that I can check for and fix external usages I know of
> without having to distinguish emacs versions.
Then maybe we shouldn't move it, just for these reasons.
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Michael Albinus, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tassilo Horn, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Tino Calancha, 2020/02/10
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/02/14
- bug#39546: 28.0.50; Do not require subr-x at run time, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/02/19