[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray? |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Oct 2022 21:00:58 +0300 |
> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
> Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 16:16:03 +0000
>
>
> >From reading the docstring of `mapatoms', I would assume that this would
> evaluate to t:
>
> (let ((i 0))
> (mapatoms (lambda (_) (setq i (1+ i))) obarray)
> (= (length obarray) i))
>
> But instead on my system I get (length obarray) ↝ 15121 and and i ↝
> 78050, which is are at a ratio of 5.16169565505.
>
> Also interesting, if I intern a variable "foo", the value of i increases
> to 83106, while (length obarray) stays the same (?)
You assume that obarray is a flat vector or something? Or how about
if you explain why the above surprised you?
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/10/07
bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/10/06