[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray? |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Oct 2022 18:28:58 +0000 |
Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:
> On 22-10-06 20:21 , Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>
>> In that case what confuses me is that (length obarray) doesn't throw an
>> error. Or what useful information does that give me?
>
> It's a vector, and each vector has a length.
But isn't the fact that it is a vector just a detail of the internal
implementation?
What is even more vexing is that the deceptively named `obarray-size'
just calls `length'. Is there no better way to count the number of
entries in a obarray, as `hash-table-count' does for hash tables?
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/10/07
bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/06
bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/10/06