[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?
From: |
Gerd Möllmann |
Subject: |
bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray? |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Oct 2022 06:52:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (darwin) |
Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> writes:
> Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:
>> It's all history. Obarray existed since the Big Bang. Don't use it.
>
> OK, then I'll close the report. But if I am not supposed to use the
> obarrays, what would you recommend if I want to count the number of
> known symbols?
I guess you have to use mapatoms, then.
> (Context: I am trying to detect all variables defined
> in a package,
Use do-symbols and alike. Oh wait, that won't work, we don't have
packages. Did I already mention that CL packages would be really nice
to have... :-).
> and since that takes a while I wrapped the `mapatoms' call in
> a progress reporter, that needs a maximal value).
You could also do it like Apple and Microsoft do: start displaying N%
with increasing N for the first minutes, until we reach 99%, and then
leave it at that until finished. We could even offer that as a general
functionality, say with-apple-progress :-).
Or just display something that shows that it's still alive. -, \, |, /,
for example. Or the number of things processed so far.
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Gerd Möllmann, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Philip Kaludercic, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2022/10/06
- bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?,
Gerd Möllmann <=
bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/06
bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/10/06