bug#58338: 29.0.50; mapatoms called on more elements than in obarray?

[Philip Kaludercic]

Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:

> On 22-10-06 20:28 , Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>> Gerd Möllmann <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> On 22-10-06 20:21 , Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>>>
>>>> In that case what confuses me is that (length obarray) doesn't throw an
>>>> error.  Or what useful information does that give me?
>>>
>>> It's a vector, and each vector has a length.
>> But isn't the fact that it is a vector just a detail of the internal
>> implementation?
>
> It's all history.  Obarray existed since the Big Bang.  Don't use it.

OK, then I'll close the report.  But if I am not supposed to use the
obarrays, what would you recommend if I want to count the number of
known symbols?  (Context:  I am trying to detect all variables defined
in a package, and since that takes a while I wrapped the `mapatoms' call in
a progress reporter, that needs a maximal value).