[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: broken clef glyph
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: broken clef glyph |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Sep 2013 14:18:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
> Norbert, thanks for your help.
>
>
>> If someone pings the Ubuntu maintainers they might pull from
>> Debian/unstable, while they normally only pull from Debian/testing.
Debian testing is older than that (as far as I can see) and works fine.
>>
>> For Fedora - I don't know, please contact the maintainers and ask
>> them to build from branch tl2013 and not from the released sources,
>> as there are important bug fixes.
>
> Ubuntu, Fedora users, please do that!
>
>> * OpenSuSE: I just checked
>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Publishing:TeXLive/texlive
>> and it seems that Werner uses texlive-20130620-source.tar.xz without
>> any patches related to mf, so that means that OpenSuSE would ship
>> broken mpost.
>
> Reported as
>
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838374
For Ubuntu, reported as
<URL:https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-bin/+bug/1220653>
--
David Kastrup
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive, (continued)
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive, Karl Berry, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive (was: broken clef glyph), Marek Klein, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive, David Kastrup, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken mpost binary from TeXLive, Colin Campbell, 2013/09/07
- Re: broken clef glyph, Norbert Preining, 2013/09/03
- Re: broken clef glyph, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/09/03
- Re: broken clef glyph, Norbert Preining, 2013/09/03
- Re: broken clef glyph, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken clef glyph, Norbert Preining, 2013/09/04
- Re: broken clef glyph,
David Kastrup <=