[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation
From: |
Andrew Selkirk |
Subject: |
[Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Dec 2001 21:35:12 -0500 |
Hi,
It looks like activation will require some major plumbing. At one point, a
number of support classes were sucked up and incorporated directly into the
javax.activation files making the files much more difficult to read and
maintain. What were the issues/requirements that precipitated this action?
If no one objects, I would like to redesign these files and incorporate some
object design back into them. On a related issue, what is the package
namespace I should use for these support files?
gnu.classpathx.activation...
classpathx.activation...
others?
Andrew...
- [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation,
Andrew Selkirk <=
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, dog, 2001/12/03
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, Nic Ferrier, 2001/12/03
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, David Brownell, 2001/12/03
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, Andrew Selkirk, 2001/12/03
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, David Brownell, 2001/12/03
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, dog, 2001/12/04
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, David Brownell, 2001/12/04
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, dog, 2001/12/04
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, David Brownell, 2001/12/04
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, Nic Ferrier, 2001/12/04