[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Dec 2001 09:41:02 -0000 |
> It looks like activation will require some major plumbing. At one point,
a
> number of support classes were sucked up and incorporated directly into
the
> javax.activation files making the files much more difficult to read and
> maintain. What were the issues/requirements that precipitated this
action?
Sorry, what support classes?
If you're referring to the parsing stuff that was me. You abstraction didn't
actually bring anything and was broken. I fixed it by putting an FSM
directly into the classes. Personally, I don't think it makes the classes
more difficult to read.
> If no one objects, I would like to redesign these files and incorporate
some
> object design back into them.
I object. There's nothing wrong with the way they are, they work now.
Before you do this I would like you to think about the following:
What is the rationale for changing them?
Why does adding abstraction benefit the implementation?
What is the direct benefit?
How long will it take?
Nic
- [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, Andrew Selkirk, 2001/12/02
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, dog, 2001/12/03
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation,
Nic Ferrier <=
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, David Brownell, 2001/12/03
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, Andrew Selkirk, 2001/12/03
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, David Brownell, 2001/12/03
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, dog, 2001/12/04
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, David Brownell, 2001/12/04
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, dog, 2001/12/04
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, David Brownell, 2001/12/04
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation, Nic Ferrier, 2001/12/04