[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About porting to Qt.
From: |
jose maria gomez |
Subject: |
Re: About porting to Qt. |
Date: |
Sat, 3 May 2008 21:07:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
On Friday 02 May 2008 05:37:13 pm Wells, John - FS wrote:
> Hello Maria,
>
> Congratulations on your success at taking the reins of DDD. I, of
> course, do not know you and I do not your background. I have abandon
> ddd and started using gps for several reasons and I thought you might
> like know those reasons. We use gdb. It is the only debugger on our
> system and the only one we know of that is relatively robust and free.
Thanks a lot. I would like to do the very best on DDD. Thanks for share this
useful feedback about DDD. This will taken into account, or at least I will
try to. I am not an expert but I will put all my effort to put DDD on step
beyond
>
> 1. I could not find out how to establish a working directory using ddd
> and gdb. By this I mean even if I chose the Change Working Directory
> feature on the file menu and if I set the preferences on the Edit menu
> so that the source and object files were correct, gdb did not look there
> for most of my files.
>
> 2. I need more of an Interactive Development Environment and not just a
> debugger. I could not see how ddd provided that service. Where gps is
> an IDE. Gps is very straight forward and obvious.
>
> Good Luck,
Thanks a lot.
>
> John Wells
> GIS Analyst/Software Engineer
> MAPSS Team
> PNW Forest Science Lab
> Corvallis, Oregon
> 541-750-7436
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
> jose maria gomez
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 6:19 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: About porting to Qt.
>
> Hello, I am Jose Maria, the new offcial maintainer of DDD package. I am
> still
> having a look to the source and thinking about what could be the betters
>
> plans for DDD and which could be the better way to do it.
>
> One of the things I would like to do is to port DDD to Qt gui libraries.
>
> Anyway, this is not trivial. First of all, DDD need a lot of work to
> decouple
> GUI from "logic".
>
> I will inform all of you as soon as posible about the plans. Everybody
> can
> help of course and your feedback is very important.
>
> The application is in C, so i would like to rewrite most of them to
> moderm C++
> and put QT over all. At the same time I think that a good pluggin system
>
> could be really useful in this case.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ddd mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ddd
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.