[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Feature creep Was: Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature
From: |
Stephen Brandon |
Subject: |
Feature creep Was: Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:02:23 +0000 |
On Tuesday 12 Feb 2002 8:31 am, Björn wrote:
> Seconded. There are enough things missing in Gorm to make it usable right
> now -- gridding, working multiple selections, aligning etc. Why don't we
> first produce something that works really well for GNUstep, and then
> start enhancing that for portability?
And before we get too carried away with arguments about Windows interfaces,
how about someone writes a graphics backend for that platform so gnustep-gui
will actually display things on Windows? :-)
Note: gnustep-gui does compile on Windows, but cannot of course display
anything. It's great to have the classes there though.
Seriously, it would be fantastic if someone Windows-savvy (ie not me!) could
make a start on the backend.
Stephen Brandon
- Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature Was: Gorm too complex ??=, (continued)
- Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature Was: Gorm too complex ??=, Helge Hess, 2002/02/11
- Re: Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature Was: Gorm too complex ??=, Fred Kiefer, 2002/02/13
- Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature Was: Gorm too complex ??=, Helge Hess, 2002/02/14
- Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature Was: Gorm too complex ?, Chris Hanson, 2002/02/12
- Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature Was: Gorm too complex ?, Pascal Bourguignon, 2002/02/12
- Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature Was: Gorm too complex ?, Bjoern Giesler, 2002/02/12
- Feature creep Was: Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature,
Stephen Brandon <=
Re: Proposition for a Gorm feature Was: Gorm too complex, Pascal Bourguignon, 2002/02/11