[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep directory layout
|
From: |
Pete French |
|
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep directory layout |
|
Date: |
Mon, 09 Sep 2002 16:38:28 +0100 |
> Uhmm, are you sure about this? IHMO usr stands for Unix System Resources,
> and this explains also why bin and lib are there.
I was until you said that! I am 100% definite that on the Version 7 and
32V systems the home directories came under /usr, and that the
explanation I was given at age 18 was that it stood for "users". Which
I hadnt actually questioned until 30 seconds ago...
-bat.
Re: GNUstep directory layout, Jeff Teunissen, 2002/09/07
Re: GNUstep directory layout, Dennis Leeuw, 2002/09/07
Re: GNUstep directory layout, Jim Balhoff, 2002/09/07
Re: GNUstep directory layout, Martin Brecher, 2002/09/06
Re: GNUstep directory layout, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2002/09/09
Re: GNUstep directory layout, BALATON Zoltan, 2002/09/09
Re: GNUstep directory layout, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2002/09/09
Re: GNUstep directory layout, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2002/09/10
GNUstep directory layout, Adam Fedor, 2002/09/11
Re: GNUstep directory layout, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2002/09/11
Re: GNUstep directory layout, David Wetzel, 2002/09/11
Re: GNUstep directory layout, David Ayers, 2002/09/11