[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep directory layout
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep directory layout |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:57:10 +0100 (BST) |
> The last MAJOR change I'm debating is the Developer domain. It would be
> nice to have all the developer stuff in one location. The drawback is
> that we are separating things, like Libraries and Headers, which really
> should be together.
If having a Developer domain means that there is yet another directory
where tools and apps can be installed - which means yet another directory
to add to the PATH and/or to the list of dirs to search for apps, then
that is another obvious drawback - PATH and similar variables are already
too long and big.
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, (continued)
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, Jim Balhoff, 2002/09/07
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, Martin Brecher, 2002/09/06
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2002/09/09
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, BALATON Zoltan, 2002/09/09
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2002/09/09
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2002/09/10
- GNUstep directory layout, Adam Fedor, 2002/09/11
- Re: GNUstep directory layout,
Nicola Pero <=
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2002/09/11
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, David Wetzel, 2002/09/11
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, David Ayers, 2002/09/11
- Re: GNUstep directory layout, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2002/09/11