[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possib Re: Th
From: |
Pascal Bourguignon |
Subject: |
Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possib Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possib |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Sep 2002 02:43:45 +0200 (CEST) |
> From: Stefan Urbanek <urbanek@host.sk>
> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:14:57 +0100
>
> [...]
> Here I have to agree with Nicolas and I hate to say it, but today
> many people are attracted by the look. That phenomenon does not
> apply only on the software. Personaly I am fine with the next-look
> which does not distract me, but...
I would not mind themes if they were "lightweight", that is, if the
default would stay to the NeXTstep look and feel without overhead.
That is, if they were implemented as subclasses which poseAs: their
superclasses (NSWindow, NSMenuCell, etc) in a different library that I
could avoid linking.
Note a difficulty of themes with X: you have to have matching themes
in GNUstep and in the window manager, with two kinds of programming,
and two places to configure them. Messy!
Anyway, I can think of dozens of programs to write before adding
themes... For example, a MS-Windows backend would probably have more
impact on potential users of GNUstep.
> [...]
> One has to know both, good and bad, to be able to compare and tell
> what is good and what is bad. Many people know only one thing and
> will say that it is the best just because they do not know the
> other. We have to show them the good. And because there are several
> possible audiences, we have show to each audience what is good for
> it.
> [...]
Since GNUstep implements the OpenStep API, the GNUstep environment
should have about the same qualities and advantages than OPENSTEP. We
could just take the ads and evangelizing from NeXT and rerun them
substituting 'GNU' for 'NeXT'... :-)
Same about the documentation. There's no "concept" documentation for
GNUstep, because up to now, we use and read either the NeXT
documentation or the MacOSX documentation. Of course, we still need
an Open Documentation for GNUstep. But the need has not been pressing
because we already have these references.
--
__Pascal_Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The name is Baud,...... James Baud.
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possib le?), (continued)
RE: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possib le?), Pete French, 2002/09/23
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possib le?), Eric Dahlman, 2002/09/23
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possible?), Tim Harrison, 2002/09/23
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possib le?), Nicolas Roard, 2002/09/23
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possib Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possib, Stefan Urbanek, 2002/09/23
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possib Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possib,
Pascal Bourguignon <=
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possib Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows? Possib, Philippe C.D. Robert, 2002/09/24
- Re: The Path of GNUstep (Was: Re: Gnustep + mac + windows?), Andreas Heppel, 2002/09/25
- Re[3]: Gnustep + mac + windows?), Manuel Guesdon, 2002/09/25
- Re: Re[3]: Gnustep + mac + windows?), Saibot, 2002/09/26
- Re: Re[3]: Gnustep + mac + windows?), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/09/26
- Re: Re[3]: Gnustep + mac + windows?), Andreas Heppel, 2002/09/26
- Re: Gnustep + mac + windows?), Fred Kiefer, 2002/09/26
- Re: Gnustep + mac + windows?), Saibot, 2002/09/26
- Re: Gnustep + mac + windows?), Fred Kiefer, 2002/09/27
Re[5]: Gnustep + mac + windows?), Manuel Guesdon, 2002/09/26