Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control)

[Philip Mötteli]

Am Mittwoch, 22.10.03, um 22:30 Uhr (Europe/Zurich) schrieb Alex Perez:
> > > > 2. Many programs do not use AppKit. E. g. servers and Web-programs.
> > > I know, there is a shortage of GNUstep apps, but you gotta admit that
> > > a LOT of progress has been made this year!
> >
> > The hugest prograss is having WOF: GDL2 and GSWeb.

> As a GNUstep *USER* I don't give a *damn* about GDL and GSWeb. I'm sure
> they're nice and all, and I know what they do, but they are useless to 
> me,
> as they are to all end users. I urge you to try and not be so 
> one-sided in
> your view of what is valuable in GNUstep.

In your eyes, what is this thread all about?
.
.
.
.
I give you my opinion, of what I thought this thread is about (I should 
know, because I started it together with the other Phil, who was 
frustrated about seeing GS still living in the shadow):
It's about on what I would propose to invest our time in order to bring 
GS out of its life in the shadow.
From that point of view I said that things like completing the 
libraries (on all platforms) then completing GDL2 and GSW would help 
much more, than investing time into desktops, window-managers or 
distributions. Now! Later we should attack these.


>  You might like what you find if
> you do so.

Would you still make this statement, now, that you know what this 
thread is about? Then please explain.


Re
Phil