[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: {Spam?}
|
From: |
Chris B. Vetter |
|
Subject: |
Re: {Spam?} |
|
Date: |
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:42:10 -0800 |
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:19:11 -0700
Adam Fedor <fedor@doc.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, at 10:12 PM, Gregory John Casamento
> wrote:
> > Given that this is a public list and that spam does come through it
> > on occasion, the reports may not be on purpose. I suggest you
> > investigate that
> > possibility before assuming that it's a malicious act.
> This list is closed to all non-subscribers (unless I specifically
> approve a post), so there should not be any spam on the list.
Some mails produce false positives and are tagged as SPAM.
From: Enrico Sersale <enrico@imago.ro>
To: Stefan Urbanek <stefan@agentfarms.net>
Cc: discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
Subject: [SPAM?] Re: Application roles - first steps
[...]
Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 4.8 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- ------------------------------
3.0 VBOUNCE_APPLICATION Virus bounce - variation on Re: Your
application
2.5 HAS_KNOWN_SUBJ_001 Subject has known spam-typical
phrases!
[...]
If anyone here uses something like Razor agents it would automagically
get reported as SPAM.
--
Chris