[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GSWHackers] Future of GnusStep WebObject
From: |
S.J.Chun |
Subject: |
Re: [GSWHackers] Future of GnusStep WebObject |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 02:36:33 +0900 (KST) |
Great support :-) I'll try this tonight.
----- Original Message -----
From: Helge Hess <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>
To: NeXT <chunsj@embian.com>
Cc: discuss GNUstep <discuss-gnustep@gnu.org>
Sent: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:53:26 +0100
Subject: Re: [GSWHackers] Future of GnusStep WebObject
On Mar 2, 2004, at 4:27 PM, NeXT wrote:
>> Hm. I might add this as an compatibility option to SOPE, no big deal,
>> stay tuned ;-)
> Good to here :-)
OK, just implemented your requests ;-) (libNGObjWeb v4.2.314)
a) removed dependency on EOSQLParser (does it work now with GDL
EOControl?)
b) added ability to use system KVC for key/value associations, just do
Defaults write NSGlobalDomain \
WOKeyPathAssociationClass WOKeyPathAssociationSystemKVC
this should give you ivar KVC (to revert, just delete the key)
Let me know what if you encounter further issues ;-)
regards,
Helge
--
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
OpenGroupware.org
- Re: [GSWHackers] Future of GnusStep WebObject, (continued)
- Re: [GSWHackers] Future of GnusStep WebObject, NeXT, 2004/03/02
- Re: [GSWHackers] Future of GnusStep WebObject, Helge Hess, 2004/03/03
- Re: [GSWHackers] Future of GnusStep WebObject, David Ayers, 2004/03/04
- Re: [GSWHackers] Future of GnusStep WebObject, NeXT, 2004/03/04
- Re: [GSWHackers] Future of GnusStep WebObject, David Ayers, 2004/03/05
- Re: [GSWHackers] Future of GnusStep WebObject, Evan Prodromou, 2004/03/03
- Re[2]: [GSWHackers] Future of GnusStep WebObject, Manuel Guesdon, 2004/03/05
Re: [GSWHackers] Future of GnusStep WebObject,
S.J.Chun <=