[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Should invisible imply intangible?

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: Should invisible imply intangible?
Date: 16 Mar 2002 09:56:33 +0900

"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:
> I'm not completely sure about that.  After all, why would someone
> put a `display' property on an `invisible' overlay if the `invisible'
> property means that the `display' property will be ignored anyway ?

Perhaps the properties come from different sources (e.g., one form a
text property, one from an overlay)?

Yo mama's so fat when she gets on an elevator it HAS to go down.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]