[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5
From: |
Joe Buehler |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5 |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Jan 2003 11:19:15 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
+#ifdef _P
+#undef _P
+#endif
#ifndef _P
# ifdef __STDC__
# define _P(a) a
Why isn't the original #ifndef guard enough to solve the problem on
Cygwin? Could you please show how does the original code fail, and
explain why?
The problem is that _P is defined in the cygwin header files in a manner
that is incompatible with its usage above. It is one of a set of macros
used in code that classifies characters as white space, printable, etc.:
ctype.h:#define _P 020
ctype.h:#define ispunct(c) ((_ctype_+1)[(unsigned)(c)]&_P)
ctype.h:#define isprint(c) ((_ctype_+1)[(unsigned)(c)]&(_P|_U|_L|_N|_B))
ctype.h:#define isgraph(c) ((_ctype_+1)[(unsigned)(c)]&(_P|_U|_L|_N))
The above usage in pop.c does not seem correct to me -- aren't symbols
beginning with _ supposed to be reserved for the compilation system, to avoid
conflicts such as this one?
--- src/mem-limits.h 19 Aug 2002 17:45:50 -0000 1.31
+++ src/mem-limits.h 6 Dec 2002 16:35:33 -0000
@@ -46,6 +46,10 @@
#define BSD4_2
#endif
+#ifdef CYGWIN
+#define BSD4_2
+#endif
Can't this be done in src/s/cygwin.h?
Setgid on a directory does not cause group inheritance under cygwin,
so the code in dired.c for BSD4_2 is incorrect in that case. The ifdef
could be moved to dired.c. I don't like the idea of defining it in
cygwin.h, however, since BSD4_2 has nothing to do with cygwin...
--
Joe Buehler
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5,
Joe Buehler <=
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/04
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/04
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/01/05
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/05
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Joe Buehler, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/08
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/09