[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5 |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jan 2003 18:14:11 -0500 |
Defining P_ in config.h (via configure) is of course possible, but
even if we change everything (except the Glibc originated files) to
use P_, we still will have the __P definition in config.h
Why would we still have the __P definition in config.h?
Is there some reason we could not delete it, once it was not used?
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Joe Buehler, 2003/01/03
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/04
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/04
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/01/05
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/05
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Joe Buehler, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/08
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/10
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/10
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/10
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/12
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/10
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/05
Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/04