[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jan 2003 20:09:37 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 09:56:16 +0900 (JST)
> From: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
>
> But, I think it's also the general idea of Emacs to
> decode/encode characters automatically. As far as we expose
> process-environment, the strings in it should already be
> decoded.
I agree. Text strings exposed to Lisp programs should be in the
internal representation, i.e. decoded. Otherwise, Lisp programs would
be unable to easily use them in text-processing context.
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, (continued)
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Stefan Monnier, 2003/01/27
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/26
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/26
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/28
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/28
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/27
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/26
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/21
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/23
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/24
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/26
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/26
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/27
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/26
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/26