[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:27:27 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I agree. Text strings exposed to Lisp programs should be in the
> internal representation, i.e. decoded. Otherwise, Lisp programs would
> be unable to easily use them in text-processing context.
> This would be true ordinarily, but here there is a more important
> factor. The usual thing to do with environment variables is to pass
> them through. Making sure that is solidly reliable is the highest
> priority for environment variables. Therefore we have to leave these
> strings in their original format.
For that, as I wrote before, we can attach a text-property
that contains the original unibyte string.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, (continued)
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/21
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/23
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Kenichi Handa, 2003/01/24
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/25
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/26
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/26
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/27
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: environment variable don't get coding conversion, Dave Love, 2003/01/26