[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: INSTALL-CVS
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: INSTALL-CVS |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Jun 2003 23:35:08 +0100 |
> Sorry, I forgot all those gory details. The _real_ answer to your
> question is that (1) "make bootstrap" builds the Info manuals,
> and (2) if you build the CVS without bootstrapping, "make instal"
> will make sure the Info manuals are up to date, and if not rebuild
> them (see the target install-arch-indep which depends on info).
>
> Given that, do you still think we should tell users to invoke Make in
> the man subdirectory, and if so, why?
make bootstrap takes a very long time on my machine. I don't want to use make
install as I use everything where it was built (my CVS copy crashes far too
often to put it anywhere permanent ;-)). I do want up-to-date documentation,
however, as that is one source of information for the current build. I would
guess there are others who think likewise.
Nick
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/06/01
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Nick Roberts, 2003/06/01
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/06/02
- Re: INSTALL-CVS,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/03
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, David Masterson, 2003/06/03
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Andreas Schwab, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, David Masterson, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, David Masterson, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/05
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/05