[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: INSTALL-CVS
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: INSTALL-CVS |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Jun 2003 23:34:59 +0100 |
> I have changed my Makefile.in long ago to add `man' to the default
> target. The only cases where it might hurt is if the Emacs tarball
> comes with Texinfo files more recent than the Info files (that would
> be a bug in the tarball) or if the program that untars the tarball
> does not obey the timestamps in the tarball and happens to untar
> the Texinfo files after untarring the Ifno files.
>
> Maybe we can avoid all this by using two different Makefile.in
> depending on whether it's checked out via CVS or taken from a tarball.
> I.e. the `make-dist' script would slightly adjust the Makefile.in by
> removing the `man' target from the default target.
Assuming that the advice in INSTALL-CVS is sound, why would the target below,
added to the Makefile (or rather Makefile.in) in the top directory, not work?
cvs:
$(MAKE)
(cd lisp; $(MAKE) recompile EMACS=../src/emacs)
$(MAKE)
(cd man; $(MAKE))
then INSTALL-CVS could advise:
$ ./configure
$ make cvs
after an update.
Nick
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/06/01
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Nick Roberts, 2003/06/01
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/03
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, David Masterson, 2003/06/03
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Andreas Schwab, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, David Masterson, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, David Masterson, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Stefan Monnier, 2003/06/04
- Re: INSTALL-CVS, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/05