[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: locate-with-filter
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: locate-with-filter |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:41:48 -0600 (CST) |
Richard Stallman wrote:
The problem with `locate'
to refer to the executable program of that name is that it creates a
link to the _Emacs_ command locate, creating even more confusion.
We should suppress the link in that case. Does this patch do it?
It still produces a link, in the sense that it will show the docstring
of the function `locate' if you hit RET on the `locate' in
"program `locate'", but at least, after the patch, the word `locate'
is no longer underlined.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/11
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/12
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/13
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/14
- Re: locate-with-filter,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/15
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/15
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/15
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/15
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/16
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/16
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/16
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/18
- Re: locate-with-filter, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/18
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/18