[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: locate-with-filter
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: locate-with-filter |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Mar 2006 21:59:58 +1300 |
> I think we can effectively eliminate help-follow. It is not used for
> following any of the links that are explicitly presented in the doc
> string.
>
> So I propose this change:
I don't like this change because the current behaviour is useful for links
that aren't explicitly presented in the doc string/value. I don't find that I
invoke help-follow accidentally, so why remove this functionality?
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Re: locate-with-filter, (continued)
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/15
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/15
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/16
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/16
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/16
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/18
- Re: locate-with-filter,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/18
- Re: locate-with-filter, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/18
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/18
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/19
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/19
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/19
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/19
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/20
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/20
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/20