[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: locate-with-filter
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: locate-with-filter |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:33:23 -0600 (CST) |
>From my previous message:
The problem with `locate'
to refer to the executable program of that name is that it creates a
link to the _Emacs_ command locate, creating even more confusion.
We should suppress the link in that case. Does this patch do it?
It still produces a link, in the sense that it will show the docstring
of the function `locate' if you hit RET on the `locate' in
"program `locate'", but at least, after the patch, the word `locate'
is no longer underlined.
Actually, the fact that it still produces a link is just a special
case of the fact that apparently _every_ word in a docstring, whether
quoted or not, is a link if you click the mouse or press RET on it, as
long as it is the name of a Lisp function, variable or face. For
instance if you click the mouse or press RET on any of the words
"and, or, not, when, if, while" and so on in a docstring, whether
quoted or not, you go to the doc of the corresponding Lisp function.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: locate-with-filter, (continued)
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/12
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/13
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/14
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/15
- Re: locate-with-filter,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/15
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/15
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/15
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/16
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/16
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/16
- Re: locate-with-filter, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/18
- Re: locate-with-filter, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/18
- Re: locate-with-filter, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/18
- Re: locate-with-filter, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/18