[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-22.1 development?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Post-22.1 development? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:20:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> - Session management. We have that now in 22.1, but Emacs does not restore
>> the frame layout as it was.
>> Could you explain that failure more clearly?
> Say I have 2 or more frames when the session exits. When the session is
> started again (i.e. I log in again in Gnome), the frames are not restored,
> only one new initial frame is created.
Indeed, desktop.el only saves/restores buffers and windows but not frames.
session.el does save/restore frames.
Stefan
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], (continued)
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Ken Raeburn, 2007/06/08
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Richard Stallman, 2007/06/09
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2007/06/09
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Jan Djärv, 2007/06/10
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Richard Stallman, 2007/06/10
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Ken Raeburn, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Tom Tromey, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- desktop.el/session.el [was: Post-22.1 development?], Davis Herring, 2007/06/08
- Re: desktop.el/session.el, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/08
- Re: desktop.el/session.el, Juri Linkov, 2007/06/09
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/09
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/10
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/09
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Sean O'Rourke, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/07